Extract
Note: Please read the
complete full text with Figures and Tables at
Introduction
Recently, it was summarized that
apart from allergic disease, mast cells were associated with at
least 35 different non-allergic clinical disorders[1].
The increased numbers of mast cells or mast cell degranulation being
observed in these diseases implied that this cell type was most
likely involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Since mast
cells carry out their functions mainly through their released
mediators including histamine, tryptase, chymase, heparin,
cytokines, and other products[2,3], the understanding of
mediator release properties of mast cells is crucial for our study
on the roles of mast cells in diseases.
Tryptase is a tetrameric serine
proteinase that constitutes some 20% of the total protein within
human mast cells and is stored almost exclusively in the secretory
granules of mast cells[4] in a catalytically active form[5].
Upon degranulation, tryptase is released from mast cells along with
histamine and other mast cell products.
For more than four decades,
histamine has been widely used as a marker of mast cell
degranulation in vitro, and numerous anti-allergic drugs such
as sodium cromoglycate, lodoxamide, salbutamal, ketotifen,
terfenadine, and cetirizine[6,7], and salmeteral[8]
were reported to inhibit anti-IgE induced histamine release from
human tonsil, skin, or lung mast cells. Therefore, both tryptase and
histamine were used as markers of mast cell degranulation in the
current study.
In recent years, it was found that
PAR-2, a receptor of trypsin and tryptase[9] was
expressed on human mast cells[10] and PAR-2 agonists were
reported to be capable of activating rat peritoneal mast cells[11]
and human gut mast cells[12]. However, the potential
effects of PAR-2 agonists including trypsin, SLIGKV, and tc-LIGRLO[13]
on human tonsil and skin mast cells have not been examined.
Therefore, the actions of these PAR-2 agonists on tonsil and skin
mast cells were investigated in the current study. We reported that
histamine was able to activate gut mast cells, which presents a
self-amplification mechanism of mast cell degranulation[14].
Since human mast cells from different anatomical sources may respond
to a stimulus to different extents, which has long been known as
mast cell heterogeneity[15], the effect of histamine on
tryptase release from human tonsil and skin mast cells was also
examined in this study.
Materials and methods
Dispersion of mast cells
Human tonsil and skin tissue were
obtained at tonsillectomy and circumcision, from the Pathology
Department of Shantou University Medical College (Shantou, China).
Informed consent from the patients and agreement of the Ethical
Committee of the college were obtained. Only macroscopically normal
tissues were used for the study. The mast cell dispersion procedures
employed were similar to that described previously[16].
Briefly, finely chopped tissue was incubated with 1.5 g/L
collagenase (Sigma, USA) and 0.75 g/L hyaluronidase (Sigma) in
minimum essential medium (MEM, Gibco, Invitrogen Corpora-tion, USA)
containing 25 mmol/L N-2-hydroxylethyl-pipera-zine-N'-2-ethane
sulphonic acid (HEPES) and 2% foetal calf serum (FCS, 1 g tonsil/10
mL buffer and 1 g skin/15 mL buffer) at 37 ¡ãC for 60-70 min.
Dispersed cells were separated from undigested tissue by filtration
through nylon gauze (pore size 100 µm diameter), washed and
maintained in MEM (containing 10% FCS, 200 kU/L benzylpenicillin,
and 200 mg/L streptomycin) on a roller overnight at room
temperature. Mast cell purity, as determined by light microscopy
after staining by alcine blue, ranged from 0.5% to 1.1% for tonsil
cells and 3.5% to 5.8% for skin cells.
Mast cell challenge Dispersed
cells were resuspended in HEPES buffered salt solution (HBSS, pH
7.4) with CaCl2 and MgCl2 (complete HBSS).
Aliquots of 100 µL containing 4¡Á103-6¡Á103 mast
cells were added a 50-µL of tc-LIGRLO (Meilian, GuZhen Town, China),
tc-OLRGIL (Meilian), SLIGKV (Meilian), VKGILS (Meilian), trypsin
(Sigma), tryptase (self-prepared[17]), histamine (Sigma),
anti-IgE antibody (Serotec, Oxford, UK), calcium ionophore (CI)
(Sigma), SBTI (Sigma), or a1-AT (Sigma), and incubated at
37 ¡ãC for 15 min. The reaction was terminated by addition of 150 µL
ice cold incomplete HBSS and tubes were centrifuged immediately
(500¡Ág, 10 min, 4 ¡ãC). All experiments were performed in
duplicate. For measuring of total histamine or tryptase
concentrations, four tubes were either boiled for 6 min or the
freeze-thaw cycle was repeated five times. Supernatants were stored
at -20 ¡ãC until tryptase and histamine concentrations were
determined (in duplicate for each tube).
Inhibition of release of tryptase
or histamine When added, SBTI or a1-AT were incubated
with trypsin for 20 min on ice before adding to cells. Data were
expressed as the percentage inhibition of tryptase or histamine
release, taking into account histamine or tryptase release in
presence and absence of the inhibitor. When the experiments with
pertussis toxin were performed, cells were incubated with
1.0 mg/L pertussis toxin at 37 ¡ãC for 4 h, and then washed with HBSS
before stimulus being added. When the experiments with metabolic
inhibitors were performed, cells were incubated with 2-deoxy-D-glucose
(10 mmol/L, Sigma) and antimycin A (1 µmol/L, Sigma) at 37 ¡ãC for 40
min before being challenged with stimulus.
Tryptase and histamine
measurement Tryptase concentrations were measured with a
sandwich ELISA procedure with a specific polyclonal antibody against
human tryptase as the capture antibody and AA5 a monoclonal antibody
specific for human tryptase (both donated by Dr Andrew FW,
University of Southampton, UK) as the detecting antibody[18].
Histamine concentrations were determined using a glass fibre-based
fluorometric assay[16].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS software. Data
were expressed as mean¡ÀSD. Where analysis of variance indicated
significant differences between groups with ANOVA, for the
preplanned comparisons of interest, Student's t-test was
applied. P<0.05 was taken as a statistically significant
difference.
Results
Effect of PAR-2 agonists and their
reverse peptides on tryptase and histamine release from tonsil and
skin mast cells PAR-2
agonist peptide SLIGKV at the concentrations of 1, 10, and 100
µmol¡¤L-1 was able to induce a dose-dependent release of
histamine (ranging from 8.9% to 13.8% net histamine release), but
not tryptase (data not shown) from skin mast cells. However, SLIGKV
at 300 µmol¡¤L-1 failed to induce histamine release from
skin mast cells. In the same experiments, a reverse peptide of
SLIGKV, VKGILS had little effect on histamine release. In contrast
to skin mast cells, tonsil mast cells released more tryptase, but
not histamine (data not shown) in response to SLIGKV. In the same
experiments, VKGILS induced significantly less tryptase release from
tonsil cells than SLIGKV did. Another PAR-2 agonist peptide
tc-LIGRLO was able to induce significant release of histamine from
skin mast cells and release of tryptase from tonsil mast cells, but
the extent of histamine and tryptase release induced by tc-LIGRLO
appeared less than that induced by its reverse peptide tc-OLRGIL
(Table 1).
Effects of trypsin, anti-IgE, CI,
and histamine on tryptase release from tonsil and skin mast cells
Trypsin was able to induce a "bell" shape increase in tryptase
release from tonsil mast cells. The maximum of net tryptase release
was 19.4% induced by 1 mg/L trypsin (Figure 1). With the same
experimental procedure, trypsin failed to induce significant
tryptase release from skin mast cells (Figure 2). Anti-IgE was able
to stimulate tryptase release from both tonsil and skin mast cells
(Figure 1, 2). The maximum release of tryptase from tonsil cells was
17.7% induced by 10 mg/L anti-IgE. CI at the concentrations of 0.1,
0.3, and 1 mg/L was able to provoke a dose-dependent release of
tryptase from tonsil mast cells (Figure 1). The maximum release of
tryptase from tonsil cells was 22.8% induced by 1 mg/L CI (Figure
1). CI at the concentration of 1 mg/L was also able to induce
significant tryptase release from skin mast cells (Figure 2).
Effects of trypsin, anti-IgE, CI,
and tryptase on histamine release from tonsil and skin mast cells
Trypsin at the concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, 10, and 100 mg/L was able
to induce a dose-dependent release of histamine from skin mast cells
(Figure 2). The maximum of histamine release was 13.9% induced by100
mg/L trypsin. Trypsin at the concentrations of 10 and 100 mg/L was
also able to induce significant histamine release from tonsil mast
cells (Figure 3). Similarly, anti-IgE and CI were able to induce a
dose-dependent release of histamine from tonsil mast cells. Up
to12.8% release of histamine from tonsil mast cells was observed
when cells were incubated with tryptase 10 mg/L (Figure 3).
Time course for tryptase and
histamine release from tonsil mast cells Time course study
revealed that both tryptase and histamine release induced by anti-IgE,
histamine, and CI from tonsil mast cells initiated within 10 s when
cells were incubated with stimulus. Up to 45% and 31% of the maximum
tryptase and histamine release were observed 10 s after cells were
incubated with stimulus. The peak tryptase release from tonsil cells
occurred at 4 min for CI and histamine, and 6 min for anti-IgE
following incubation (Figure 4). In comparison, the peak of
histamine release induced by anti-IgE or CI occurred at 5 min and 6
min, respectively (Figure 4). Similarly, tc-LIGRLO, trypsin, and
CI-induced histamine release from skin mast cells all started within
10 s of stimulation. But the peak histamine release occurred at 4
min for CI and 6 min for tc-LIGRLO and trypsin (Figure 5).
Inhibition of trypsin-induced
tryptase and histamine release by trypsin inhibitors The
trypsin-induced tryptase release from tonsil mast cells was
inhibited by approximately 65.1% and 62.2% by SBTI or a1-AT,
respectively (Table 2). Similarly, the trypsin-induced histamine
release from tonsil mast cells was inhibited by approximately 82.4%
and 80.4% by SBTI or a1-AT, respectively (Table 2). SBTI
or a1-AT were also able to inhibit trypsin-induced
histamine release from skin mast cells by 77.2% and 63.2%,
respectively (Table 2).
Inhibition of tryptase and
histamine release by pertussis toxin and metabolic inhibitors
Pretreatment of cells with metabolic inhibitors (10 mmol/L of
2-deoxy-D-glucose and 1 µmol/L of antimycin A) reduced
trypsin-induced tryptase release from tonsil cells and histamine
release from skin cells by 79.4% and 61.9%, respectively. Metabolic
inhibitors were also able to inhibit histamine-induced tryptase
release from tonsil mast cells, and tc-LIGRLO and SLIGKV-induced
histamine release from skin mast cells. Pretreatment of cells with 1
mg/L pertussis toxin diminished both trypsin and histamine-induced
tryptase release from tonsil mast cells, and trypsin, tc-LIGRLO, and
SLIGKV-provoked histamine release from skin mast cells. Similarly,
metabolic inhibitors and pertussis toxins were able to inhibit both
anti-IgE and CI-induced tryptase and histamine release from both
tonsil and skin mast cells (Table 3).
¡¡
Discussion
We have reported the in vitro
tryptase release properties of human tonsil and skin mast cells.
This was particularly important when tryptase and histamine, the two
major mast cell mediators were investigated in parallel in the same
experiments, which not only proved that the quantities of the two
mediators released from mast cells were in an inconstant ratio, but
also revealed that the pace of release was different between
histamine and tryptase upon mast cell degranulation. These phenomena
were similar to our previous findings with human colon mast cells[12].
Trypsin at 1 mg/L was able to
stimulate the maximum tryptase release (19.4%), but not significant
histamine release from tonsil mast cells. In contrast, trypsin at
100 mg/L was able to stimulate 16.4% histamine release, but not
significant tryptase release from tonsil mast cells. These are
surprising observations, which suggests strongly that tryptase and
histamine release from tonsil mast cells induced by trypsin may be
involved in different mechanisms. Since anti-IgE and CI also showed
"bell" shape tryptase release and dose-dependent histamine release
patterns in the same experimental system, these observations may
reflect a common phenomenon of tonsil mast cell degranulation. It is
most likely that tryptase release pathway of tonsil mast cells has
the ability to prevent itself from strong stimulation. However, more
experiments are needed to prove this. In contrast to mast cells from
tonsil, mast cells from skin released only histamine, but not
tryptase in response to trypsin, which indicated further that
tryptase and histamine release from human mast cells induced by
trypsin was through different mechanisms. The difference in the
ability of trypsin inhibitors to inhibit trypsin induced histamine
release (up to 82.4%) and tryptase release (up to 65%) may also
suggest the different mechanisms involved in tryptase and histamine
release from tonsil mast cells.
Moreover, PAR-2 agonist peptides
SLIGKV and tc-LIGRLO showed different effects on tryptase and
histamine release from mast cells. As for trypsin, SLIGKV was also
able to stimulate histamine release, but not tryptase release from
skin mast cells. The extent of histamine release induced by SLIGKV
was similar to that induced by trypsin, indicating that the actions
of trypsin on skin mast cells may be through PAR-2. Because VKGILS
(a reversed peptide of SLIGKV) had little effect on tryptase and
histamine release from skin mast cells, the action of SLIGKV on skin
mast cells was a specific one. Different from skin mast cells,
tonsil mast cells released tryptase but not histamine in response to
SLIGKV. This suggested that trypsin induced histamine release from
tonsil mast cells might not be through a PAR-2 related mechanism. It
suggested also that release of tryptase and histamine from tonsil
mast cells upon stimulation might not occur simultaneously. Another
PAR-2 agonist peptide tc-LIGRLO had a similar effect to SLIGKV on
skin mast cells, confirming further the functional expression of
PAR-2 on these cells. Interestingly, tc-OLRGIL a reversed peptide of
tc-LIGRLO appeared a potent stimulus of histamine release from skin
mast cells, and a secretagogue of tryptase release from tonsil mast
cells. The physiological or pathophysiological meaning of the action
of tc-OLRGIL on mast cells requires further investigation to be
understood.
Consistent with our previous
findings[14,15], histamine exhibited its ability to
stimulate tryptase release from tonsil mast cells, and tryptase
showed its ability to provoke histamine release from mast cells.
These implicated that there were at least two self-amplification
mechanisms of mast cell degranulation in the human tonsil; the
histamine associated mechanism and the tryptase associated
mechanism.
Approximately 30% tryptase and
histamine release occurred within 10 s of IgE-dependent stimulation,
suggesting that tonsil mast cells were able to quickly respond to
allergen challenge, but to reach their full capacity (maximum
histamine or tryptase release) a minimum of 5 min was required. The
time courses for CI were similar to those for anti-IgE, except for a
minimum 4 min being required to reach the full tryptase and
histamine release capacity. The reasons for the relatively slow
release of mediators from human mast cells remain unclear.
Approximately 45% tryptase release induced by histamine was
completed within the first 10 s of stimulation, indicating that the
process may be different from the one induced by anti-IgE or CI. The
time courses for histamine release from skin mast cells induced by
CI and tc-LIGRLO were quite similar, indicating tc-LIGRLO may act
like CI on induction of mast cell degranulation.
Pretreatment of cells with metabolic
inhibitors abolished the actions of anti-IgE and CI on mast cells,
indicating that tryptase and histamine release induced by them was a
non-cytotoxic process, and was dependent on cell energy supply. The
inhibition of tryptase and histamine release by pertussis toxin
suggested that the release process was associated with activation of
G-protein coupled receptors.
In conclusion, it was found that
tryptase release properties of human tonsil and skin mast cells were
similar to the histamine release properties of these cells in
response to anti-IgE and CI. In contrast, tryptase release
properties were quite different from histamine release properties in
response to PAR-2 agonists including trypsin, tc-LIGRLO, and SLIGKV,
which uncovered a novel type of mast cell heterogeneity in response
to different stimulation. The activation of mast cells by PAR-2
agonists may indicate a self-amplification mechanism of mast cell
degranulation in humans.
References
- 1 He S. The key role of mast
cells and their major secretory products in inflammatory bowel
disease. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10: 309-18.
- 2 Walls AF, He S, Buckley MG,
McEuen AR. Roles of the mast cell and basophil in asthma. Clin
Exp Allergy Rev 2001; 1: 68-72.
- 3 He S, Chen HQ, Zheng J.
Inhibition of tryptase and chymase induced nucleated cell
infiltration by proteinase inhibitors. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004;
25: 1677-84.
- 4 Schwartz LB. Preformed
mediators of human mast cells and basophils. In: Holgate ST,
editor. Mast cells, mediators and disease. Dordrect: Kluwer
Academic Publishers; 1988. p 129-47.
- 5 McEuen AR, He S, Brander ML,
Walls AF. Guinea pig lung tryptase: Localisation to mast cells
and characterisation of the partially purified enzyme. Biochem
Pharmacol 1996; 52: 331-40.
- 6 Okayama Y, Church MK.
Comparison of the modulatory effect of ketotifen, sodium
cromoglycate, procaterol and salbutamol in human skin, lung and
tonsil mast cells. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1992; 97:
216-25.
- 7 Okayama Y, Benyon RC, Lowman
MA, Church MK. In vitro effects of H1-antihistamine
and PGD2 release from mast cells of human lung,
tonsil, and skin. Allergy 1994; 49: 246-53.
- 8 Butchers PR, Vardey CJ,
Johnson M. Salmeterol: a potent and long-acting inhibitor of
inflammatory mediator release from human lung. Br J Pharmacol
1991; 104: 67-26.
- 9 Molino M, Barnathan ES,
Numerof R, Clark J, Dreyer M, Cumashi A, et al.
Interactions of mast cell tryptase with thrombin receptors and
PAR-2. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 4043-9.
- 10 D'Andrea MR, Rogahn CJ,
Andrade-Gordon P. Localization of protease-activated receptors-1
and -2 in human mast cells: indications for an amplified mast
cell degranulation cascade. Biotech Histochem 2000; 75: 85-90.
- 11 Stenton GR, Nohara O, Dery
RE, Vliagoftis H, Gilchrist M, Johri A, et al. Proteinase-activated
receptor (PAR)-1 and -2 agonists induce mediator release from
mast cells by pathways distinct from PAR-1 and PAR-2. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002; 302: 466-74.
- 12 He S, He Y, Xie H.
Activation of human colon mast cells through proteinase
activated receptor-2 (PAR-2). World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10:
327-31.
- 13 Hollenberg MD, Saifeddine M,
al-Ani B, Kawabata A. Proteinase-activated receptors: structural
requirements for activity, receptor cross-reactivity, and
receptor selectivity of receptor-activating peptides. Can J
Physiol Pharmacol 1997; 75: 832-41.
- 14 He S, Xie H. Modulation of
tryptase secretion from human colon mast cells by histamine.
World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10: 323-26.
- 15 He S, Gaça MDA, Walls AF. A
role for tryptase in the activation of human mast cells:
modulation of histamine release by tryptase and inhibitors of
tryptase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998; 286: 289-97.
- 16 He S, Xie H, Zhang XJ, Wang
XJ. Inhibition of histamine release from human mast cells by
natural chymase inhibitors. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004; 25: 822-6.
- 17 He S, Chen P, Chen HQ.
Modulation of enzymatic activity of human mast cell tryptase and
chymase by proteinase inhibitors. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2003; 24:
923-9.
- 18 Buckley MG, Walters C,
Brander M, Wong WM, Cawley MI, Ren S, et al. Mast cell
activation in arthritis: detection of
¦Á- and ¦Â-tryptase, histamine
and eosinophil cationic protein in synovial fluid. Clin Sci
1997; 93: 363-70.
|