Extract
Note: Please read the
complete full text with Figures and Tables at
Introduction
Liver transplantation is one of the
most effective treatments for patients with acute and chronic liver
failure[1]. However, since donor livers are scare, only a
small number of patients can receive a replacement liver in time.
Thus, it is necessary to seek alternative therapies to replace liver
transplantation.
Bioartificial liver or hepatocyte
transplantation, serving as temporary liver support, can provide
necessary liver functions[2-3]. The functional hepatocyte
is the core of the temporary liver support. Since donor hepatocytes
are limited, it is imperative to explore ways to gain functional
hepatocytes. Stem cells are defined as cells that have clonogenic
and self-renewing capabilities, and can differentiate into multiple
different cell types that make up the organ under the right
condition or given the right signals[4]. Thus, stem cell
can be an ideal resource of functional hepatocytes.
Hepatocytes originating from bone
marrow stem cells were first observed in rats after combined bone
marrow transplantation and liver damage. In rats, a combination of
hepatotoxin, which induces widespread liver damage, and
2-acetylaminofluorine, which prevents endogenous liver repair, were
used. Then, a combination of Y chromosome fluorescence in situ
hybridization (FISH) and transgene expression were used to confirm
that bone marrow stem cells were the source of resultant hepatocytes[5].
The same results were demonstrated in mice[6] and humans[7,8].
In a later study, Lagasse et al demonstrated that
transplantation of
xc-kithighThy11ow Lin-Sca-1+(KTLS)
bone marrow cells to irradiated hosts could treat an inborn error of
hepatic meta-
bolism[9]. Multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs), a
subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells in the bone marrow, were
found to differentiate into many kinds of cells including
hepatocytes[10]. Recently, it has been reported that bone
marrow stromal cells can develop into hepatocyte-like cells[11].
Thus, we can confirm from these findings that stem cells in bone
marrow exist and can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo
and in vitro.
The differentiation processes of
stem cells are likely to be complex, but must exist in the
microenvironment of the cells, the signals which originate from the
extracellular matrix through adhesion-related events[12],
and the cocktail of soluble ligands now known to control cell
growth, differen-tiation, and morphogenesis[13]. In the
course of hepatic differentiation, some cytokines, including
fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4)[14], oncostatin M
(OSM)[15], hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)[16]
and epithermal growth factor (EGF)[17], control the
hepatic differentiation and maturation. In the present study, we
used the cell directed differentiation medium including FGF-4 and
OSM, to investigate hepatocyte-like cells from the directed
differentiation of mouse bone marrow cells in vitro.
Materials and methods
Materials
C57BL/6 mice (3-4 weeks old) were purchased from the Model Animal
Research Center of Nanjing University (Grade: SPF, No
041117035). The mice were kept individually in pathogen-free
conditions with a 12-h light/dark cycle and were fed sterile food
and water. All animals were treated in accordance with the
guidelines of the European Community Standards on the Care and Use
of Laboratory Animals (No 28871-22A9).
Dulbecco's modified essential
media-low glucose (DMEM-LG), Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium
(IMDM), L-glutamine, and fetal calf serum (FCS) were obtained
from Hyclone Laboratories (South Logan, UT84321, USA). MCDB-201,
insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS), dexametha-sone, ascorbic acid
2-phosphate, benzylpenicillin, strepto-mycin, and fibronectin were
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, Missouri 63103, USA ).
FGF-4 and OSM were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN 55413,
USA).
The antibody against mouse albumin
was obtained from Dako Systems (DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark). The
antibody against mouse cytokeratin18 was obtained from Chemicon
(Temecula, Ca 92590, USA ). Fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated secondary
antibody, phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated secondary antibody, and
rhodamine (TRITC)-conjugated secondary antibody were obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, Missouri 63103, USA). Trizol reagent was
also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. A TITANIUMTM one-step
RT-PCR kit was purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA 94303-4230,
USA). Periodic acid-Shiff (PAS) staining solution was purchased from
Shanghai Bioengineer Company (590 Zhaojiabang Road, Shanghai,
China). A Colorimetric assay kit was purchased from Randox
Laboratories (Randox Laboratories, Antrim, UK).
Preparation of bone marrow cells
Bone marrow cells were prepared as previously described[18].
Fresh bone marrow aspirate extracted from the tibias and the femora
of the C57BL/6 mice was suspended in DMEM-LG media and was
centrifuged to pellet the cells, and the fat was removed. The cell
pellet was resuspended in DMEM-LG media and fractionated on a
density gradient generated by centrifugation of 1.077 g/L percoll
solution at 1150¡Ág for 30 min at the room temperature. The
cells in the percoll interface were then collected and rinsed twice.
Cell viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test.
Only suspensions with cell viability of 95% were used.
Directed differentiation of bone
marrow cells Bone marrow cells were inoculated in bone marrow
cells' directed differentiation media at 5¡Á105 cells/cm2
in 10 mg/L fibronectin-coated culture flasks. Bone marrow cells'
directed differentiation media consisted of the following: 54%
DMEM-LG, 36% MCDB-201, 10% FCS with 1¡ÁITS, 1¡Á10-8 mol/L
dexa-methasone, 1¡Á10-4 mol/L ascorbic acid 2-phosphate,
100 U/L benzylpenicillin, 100 mg/L streptomycin, 30 ¨¬g/L FGF-4, 30
¨¬g/L OSM. As a negative control, bone marrow cells' culture medium
was similar to the directed differentiation medium but without FGF-4
and OSM. Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2
and 95% air at 37 ¡ãC. After 72 h, non-adherent cells and debris were
removed, and the adherent cells were cultured continuously. Cultures
were maintained by media exchange every 3 d.
Cell morphology was observed under
Olympus phase contrast microscope (CX40RF200, Olympus optical Co
LTD, Japan). On d 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, some cells were
detached with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution and collected for RNA
extraction. Cells on d 21 were detached with the same method and
used for experiments. Cell supernatant on d 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18,
21 were collected for albumin ELISA.
Hepatocyte isolation and culture
Hepatocytes were isolated from 3-4 weeks old C57BL/6 mice by a
conventional two-step collagenase liver perfusion[19] and
cultured on fibronectin-coated flasks 10 mg/L in IMDM containing 10%
FCS, L-glutamine 2 mmol/L, dexamethasone 1 mmol/L, insulin 1
mmol/L, benzyl penicillin 100 U/L, and streptomycin 100 mg/L.
Cultures were maintained by media exchange every 3 d.
RNA extraction and RT-PCR
analysis Total RNA was extracted by using Trizol reagent from
C57BL/6 mouse hepatocytes, fresh bone marrow cells, cultural bone
marrow cells, and directed differentiated bone marrow cells. In
total, 1 mg RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and amplification by
one-step RT-PCR kit. For hepatocyte nuclear factor-3â (HNF-3â),
albumin (ALB), cytokeratin18 (CK18) and transthyretin (TTR), the
following reaction conditions were used: reverse transcription at 50
¡ãC for 1 h, denaturation of RNA/DNA hybrid and inactivation of
reverse transcriptase at 94 ¡ãC for 5 min. Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) was used for 40 cycles, denaturation at 94 ¡ãC for 30 s,
annealing at
60 ¡ãC for 1 min, extension at 72 ¡ãC for 1 min, final extension at 72
¡ãC for 5 min. For glucose-6-phosphatase (G-6-Pase) and tyrosine
aminotransferase (TAT), the following reaction conditions were used:
reverse transcription at 50 ¡ãC for 1 h, denaturation of RNA/DNA
hybrid and inactivation of reverse transcriptase at 94 ¡ãC for 5 min.
PCR was used for 30 cycles, denaturation at 94 ¡ãC for 1 min,
annealing at 55 ¡ãC for 1 min, extension at 72 ¡ãC for 1 min, final
extension at 72 ¡ãC for 5 min.
Primers used for amplification are
listed in Table 1. All primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon
Biological Engineering Technology & Service Co Ltd , (Shanghai,
China). mRNA levels were normalized using â-actin as a housekeeping
gene. The amplified products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1%
agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.
Western blot analysis Cells,
including C57BL/6 mouse hepatocytes, fresh bone marrow cells,
cultural bone marrow cells, and directed differentiated bone marrow
cells, were washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS and lysed with lysis buffer.
About 50 ug of proteins in each supernatant were boiled for 5 min in
a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and subjected to
electrophoresis on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. The proteins were transferred
to Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) membrane through semidry transfer
at 210 mA for 0.5 h. The membrane was blocked for 30 min at room
temperature in 3% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with
0.05% Tween20, and incubated with primary antibodies against mouse
ALB (1:1000), mouse HNF-3â (1:500), and mouse CK18 (1:500) at room
temperature for 1 h. The membrane was rinsed and washed 3 times in
TBS-Tween20 for 10 min each, and then incubated at room temperature
for 1 h with a Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated second
antibody (1:1000). After adequate washes with TBS, the membrane was
stained with diaminiobenzidene (DAB) stain at room temperature for
2-3 min, and then washed with PBS.
Albumin ELISA Cell culture
media at various time points were collected as samples for ALB
ELISA. One microlitre of a monoclonal antibody against mouse ALB was
diluted with 100 mL coating buffer for each well and incubated for
60 min. After incubation, the capture antibody solution was
aspirated and washed with wash solution. Total 200 mL of blocking
solutions were added to each well and incubated for 30 min. After
incubation, the blocking solution was removed and each well was
washed. One hundred microlitre standards or samples were transferred
to assigned wells and incubated for 60 min. After incubation,
standards or samples were removed, and each well was washed. 100 uL
HRP conjugate (1:10000) were transferred to each well and incubated
for 60 min. After incubation, the HRP conjugate were removed and
each well was washed. Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) 100 mL were
transferred to each well and incubated for 30 min. To stop the TMB
reaction, 100 mL of H2SO4 2 mmol/L were
applied to each well. The plate was read at the wavelength 450 nm
for TMB through the microtitration plate reader (TECAN A-S002,
Austria).
Periodic acid-Shiff (PAS)
staining Cells were fixed with 20% formaldehyde and
intercellular glycogen was stained with PAS staining solution
according to the standard protocol.
Urea assay Urea
concentrations were measured through a colorimetric assay kit. The
mouse bone marrow cells were plated at 5¡Á105 cells/cm2
on 1 mg/L fibronectin (FN)-coated 6-well plates in bone marrow
cells' directed differentiated medium or cultural medium. The cells
(on d 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21) were incubated in 2 mL medium
containing 5 mmol/L NH4CL for 24 h in 5% CO2
at 37 ¡ãC. After incubation, the urea concentrations in the
supernatant were measured. Mouse hepatocytes grown in the monolayer
with the same density was used as positive control and culture
medium used as nega tive control. No urea was detected in culture
medium alone.
Results
Changes of cell amount and
morphology The changes in
cell amount and morphology could be seen in the course of the
cell-directed differentiation. Bone marrow cells were inoculated at
the density of 5¡Á105 cells/cm2. However, when
the nonadherent cells were removed 3 d later, we found that the
adherent cells' density was suitable for the adherent cells to grow
well. On d 12, we could see some epithelial-like cells or polygonal
cells in the directed differentiation medium, and the number and
sizes of colonies of epithelial-like cells or polygonal cells
increased in the course of the cell directed differentiation. On d
21, cells were detached and counted. The yield of the cells was
approximately 8¡Á103/cm2. In the negative
group, we could see many fibroblast-like cells or fusiform cells,
and only slight polygonal cells (Figure 1).
Gene expressions of liver
specific markers To assess the directed differentiation of bone
marrow cells into hepatic lineages, we first examined mRNA
expressions of endodermal and liver specific genes including HNF-3â,
ALB, CK18, TTR, G-6-Pase, and TAT, which could not be detected in
fresh bone marrow cells and cultural bone marrow cells (Figure 2).
In the bone marrow cells' directed differentiation culture group,
HNF-3â, ALB, and CK18 mRNA expressions first appeared within 6 d,
and lasted throughout the later directed differentiation. TTR mRNA
was expressed within 9 d, and its expression lasted throughout the
later directed differentiation. From our research, we found that
G-6-Pase and TAT mRNA expressions could be detected within 12 d, and
their expressions lasted in the course of the later directed
differentiation (Figure 2).
Protein expressions of liver
specific markers We found that fresh bone marrow cells and
cultural bone marrow cells on d 21 did not express any HNF-3â, ALB
or CK18, but directed differentiated bone marrow cells on d 21
expressed HNF-3â, ALB, and CK18 (Figure 3).
Hepatocyte functional activity
ALB secretion was measured at various times throughout the cell
differentiation. Undifferentiated bone marrow cells and cultural
bone marrow cells did not secret any ALB. Following treatment with
FGF-4 and OSM, directed differentiated bone marrow cells produced
ALB in a time-dependent manner. On d 15, the amount of secreted
albumin reached the maxium amount (Figure 4).
Intracellular glycogen accumulation,
one feature of adult liver, was analyzed by staining the cells with
the PAS reagent. A slight accumulation of glycogen was detected in
the course of directed differentiation, while no accumulation of
glycogen was found in the culture media without FGF-4 and OSM
(Figure 5).
We then assessed urea production at
various time point throughout the differentiation. Undifferentiated
bone marrow cells and cultural bone marrow cells did not produce
urea. In the directed differentiated group, directed differentiated
bone marrow cells produced urea 3 d later, and in a time-dependent
manner. On d 15, the amount of urea produced by directed
differentiated bone marrow cells reached the maxium amount (Figure
6).
Discussion
In the present study, we selected
bone marrow cells for further differentiation study because no
matter hematopoietic stem cells, multipotent progenitor cells, and
bone marrow stromal cells, they share common aspects. As bone marrow
cells, they exist in the same bone marrow cell-cell
microenvironment. They share the same character-stem cell
plasticity, which means they have the ability to differentiate into
cells of different tissue under certain microenviron-
ments[20]. It has recently been founded by reseachers
that there are ways of seperating hematopoietic stem cells and
multipotent progenitor cells from bone marrow, but there is no good
way to propagate hematopoietic stem cells in vitro. The
multipotent progenitor cells could be propagated in vitro,
but its cultural condition or requirement is very harsh[10].
In the present study, bone marrow stromal cells were shown to
differentiate into hepatocyte-like phenotypes given the HGF
induction, but these hepatocyte-like cells only expressed ALB and ¨¢-fetoprotein[11].
Furthermore, in the course of the organ development including the
developing liver, cell-cell interactions are very important for
modulating cell growth, migration, and/or differentiation, and are
imperative for coordinated organ function[21]. A directed
differentiated culture system, in which all bone marrow stem cells
could differentiate into hepatocytes would be beneficial. From our
study, we found that bone marrow cells grow easily and differentiate
well in the induction of differentiation into hepatocytes.
Liver development is known to
proceed through several distinct steps and many growth factors and
cytokines are involved in each step. In mice, the initial event in
liver development occurs at E9. The foregut endoderm becomes the
liver through interaction with the cardiogenic mesoderm[22,23].
FGF-4 is involved in endoderm specification and hepatic
differentiation in this step[14]. OSM, an interleukin
(IL)-6 family cytokeratin, is a paracrine factor produced by
hematopoietic cells and plays an important role in hepatic
maturation during the mid to late fetal stages[15]. HGF
has been shown to be important components of liver development and
the differentiation process. However, HGF is different from OSM in
inducing hepatic maturation, as it seems to be a paracrine factor
that is involved in postnatal hepatic maturation[16].
Some other cytokines, including (EGF), insulin, TGF, appear to play
important roles in liver development and regeneration[17].
The question is asked: in vitro, which cytokines will affect
hepatocyte from the directed differentiation of stem cells? Some
answers include: HGF [11,24,25], HGF and EGF[26],
HGF and FGF[27]. We established a differentiation culture
system including FGF-4, HGF, OSM, and EGF, where hepatocytes were in
the presence of FGF-4, HGF, OSM and EGF in the cell culture system.
(SHI et al, unpublished data). We then adopted a uniform
design method to research the most effective density of each
cytokine and get the most effective match of these cytokines. We
have sifted through the most effective directed differentiation
culture system including FGF-4 and OSM (SHI et al, in press).
From our research, we used the most effective directed
differentiation culture system and researched the differentiation of
bone marrow cells into hepatocytes.
In the present study, we found that
these hepatocyte-like cells expressed HNF-3â, ALB, CK18, TTR,
G-6-Pase, and TAT at the gene level and/or protein level. HNF-3â is
a hepatocyte nuclear factor, which occurs in the cell nucleus of the
premature or mature hepatocyte. Expression of ALB, the abundant
protein synthesized by mature hepatocytes, starts in early fetal
hepatocytes and reaches the maximal level in adult hepatocytes[28].
CK18 is a cytoskeletal protein and is expressed in mature
hepatocytes. TTR represents endodermal differentiation and is
expressed throughout liver maturation[29]. G-6-Pase is
predominantly expressed in the liver[28]. TAT represents
an excellent enzymatic marker for peri- or postnatal hepatocyte-specific
differentiation. Since hormone-regulated TAT activity is strictly
limited to the parenchymal cells of the adult liver, it has been
used extensively for monitoring cellular differentiation in
experimental models for liver development/maturation in vitro[30].
Furthermore, these hepatocyte-like cells had some hepatocellular
synthesis and metabolism functions, which would be used for
hepatocyte transplantation or bioartificial liver.
Bone marrow stem cell can
differentiate into hepatocytes, which is referred to as stem cell
plasticity. There are many published studies explaining stem cell
plasticity. First, multiple stem cells can coexist in multiple
tissues, even after birth, and they proliferate and differentiate in
respond to local stimulation[31]. Second, multipotent
stem cells, which are akin to ES cells, persist past initial lineage
specification[10]. Third, cells can undergo de- and
re-differentiation[32]. Cell fusion has recently been
suggested as another explanation of stem cell plasticity[33].
Irrespective of the explanations of stem cell plasticity, the fact
that bone marrow stem cell can differentiate into hepatocyte in
vitro holds great promise for the treatment of inherited and
degenerative liver diseases.
From our research, we can conclude
that our differentiation media, including FGF-4 and OSM, are
effective for differentiating bone marrow cells into hepatocyte-like
cells, which were identified at the gene level and protein level and
had some hepatocellular synthesis and metabolism functions. Thus, we
will serve these functional hepatocyte-like cells as hepatocyte
resources for bioartificial liver or hepatocyte transplantation.
References
- 1 Everhart JE, Lombardero M,
Detre KM, Zetterman RK, Wiesner RH, Lake JR, et al.
Increased waiting time for liver transplantation results in
higher mortality. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1300-6.
- 2 Suh KS, Lilja H, Kamohara Y,
Eguchi S, Arkadopoulos N, Neuman T, et al. Bioartifical
liver treatment in rats with fulminant hepatic failure: effect
on DNA-binding activity of liver-enriched and growth-associated
transcription factors. J Surg Res 1999; 85: 243-50.
- 3. Malhi H, Gupta S. Hepatocyte
transplantation: new horizons and challenges. J Hepatobiliary
Pancreat Surg 2001; 8: 40-50.
- 4. Weissman IL. Stem cells:
units of development, units of regeneration, and units in
evolution. Cell 2000; 100: 157-68.
- 5 Petersen BE, Bowen WC,
Patrene KD, Mars WM, Sullivan AK, Murase N, et al. Bone
marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science
1999; 284: 1168-70.
- 6 Theise ND, Badve S, Saxena R,
Henegariu O, Sell S, Crawford JM, et al. Derivation of
hepatocytes from bone marrow cells in mice after
radiation-induced myeloablation. Hepatology 2000; 31: 235-40.
- 7 Alison MR, Poulsom R, Jeffery
R, Dhillon AP, Quaglia A, Jacob J, et al. Hepatocytes
from non-hepatic adult stem cells. Nature 2000; 406: 257.
- 8 Theise ND, Nimmakayalu M,
Gardner R, Illei PB, Morgan G, Teperman L, et al. Liver
from bone marrow in humans. Hepatology 2000; 32: 11-6.
- 9 Lagasse E, Connors H,
Al-Dhalimy M, Reitsma M, Dohse M, Osborne L, et al.
Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into
hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med 2000; 6: 1229-34.
- 10 Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN,
Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Gonzalea XR, et al.
Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult
marrow. Nature 2002; 418: 41-9.
- 11 Wang PP, Wang JH, Ya ZP, Hu
MY, Lau GK, Fan ST, et al. Expression of hepatocyte-like
phenotypes in bone marrow stromal cells after HGF induction.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 320: 712-6.
- 12 Hemler ME, Rutishauser U.
Cell-to-cell contact and extracelluar matrix. Curr Opin Cell
Biol 2000; 12: 539-41.
- 13 Birchmeier C, Brohmann H.
Genes that control the development of migrating muscle precursor
cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2000; 12: 725-30.
- 14 Wells, J.M., Melton, DA.
Vetebrate endoderm development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1999; 15:
393-410.
- 15 Taga T, Kishimoto T. Gp130
and the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. Annu Rev Immunol
1997; 15: 797-819.
- 16 Kamiya A, Kinoshita T,
Miyajima A. Oncostatin M and hepatocute growth factor induce
hepatic maturation via distinct signaling pathways. FEBS Lett
2001; 492: 90-4.
- 17 Michalopeulos GK, DeFrances
MC. Liver regeneration. Science 1997; 276: 60-6.
- 18 Levite M, Meshorer A,
Reisner Y. A rapid method for obtaining murine bone marrow cells
in high yield. Bone Marrow Transpl 1991; 8: 225-7.
- 19 Seglen PO. Preparation of
isolated rat liver cells. Methods Cell Biol 1976; 13: 23-28.
- 20 Verfaillie CM, Pera MF,
Lansdorp PM. Stem cells: hype and reality. Hematology 2002:
369-91.
- 21 Bhatia SN, Balis UJ, Yarmush
ML, Toner M. Effect of cell-cell interactions in preservation of
cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and
nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J 1999; 13: 1883-900.
- 22 Zaret KS. Liver
specification and early morphogenesis. Mech Dev 2000; 92: 83-8.
- 23 Zaret KS. Hepatocyte
differentiation: from the endoderm and beyond. Curr Opin Genet
Dev 2001; 11: 568-74.
- 24 She HO, Masahiro M, Hirosuke
K, Yusuke I, Masakiyo S, Toshiya T, et al. Hepatocyte
growth factor induces differentiation of adult rat bone marrow
cells into a hepatocyte lineage in vitro. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 2000; 279: 500-4.
- 25 Henning CF, Michael VL,
Lourdes CD, Claudia L, Dietrich K, Boris F, et al.
Liver-specific gene expression in cultured human hematopoietic
stem cells. Stem Cells 2003; 21: 98-104.
- 26 Masahiro M, Ichiro A,
Masakiyo S, Emiko N, Mayumi O, Ken K, et al. Improved
conditions to induce hepatocytes from rat bone marrow cells in
culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 298: 24-30.
- 27 Robert ES, Morayma R, Lisa
K, Yuehua J, Mark B, Troy L, et al. Multipotent adult
progenitor cells from bone marrow differentiate into functional
hepatocyte-like cells. J Clin Invest 2002; 109: 1291-302.
- 28 Pan CJ, Lei KJ, Chen H, Ward
JM, Chou JY. Ontogeny of the murine glucose-6-phosphatase
system. Arch Biochem Biophys 1998; 358: 17-24.
- 29 Makover A, Soprano DR, Wyatt
ML and Goodman DS. An in situ-hybridization study of the
localization of retinol-binding protein and transthyretin
messenger RNAs during fetal development in the rat.
Differentiation 1989; 40: 17-25.
- 30 Shelly LL, Tynan W, Schmid
W, Schutz G, Yeoh GC. Hepatocyte differentiation in vitro:
initiation of Tyrosine amino transferase expression in cultured
fetal rat hepatocytes. J Cell Biol 1989; 109: 403-10.
- 31 Kawada H, Ogawa M. Bone
marrow origin of hematopoietic progenitors and stem cells in
murine muscle. Blood 2001; 98: 2008-13.
- 32 Wilmut I, Schnieke AE,
Mcwhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. Viable offspring derived from
fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997; 385: 810-3.
- 33 Ying QY, Nichols J, Evans
EP, Smith AG. Changing potency by spontaneous fusion. Nature
2002; 416: 545-8.
|