Lai JH / Acta Pharmacol Sin 2002 Dec; 23 (12): 1093-1101
LAI Jenn-Haung2
Rheumatology/Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, China
1 Project supported by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan, China. (NHRI-GT-EX89B915C) and Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH-C91-13).
2 Correspondence to Prof LAI Jenn-Haung, MD, PhD. Rheumatology/Immunology and Allergy, Tri-Service General Hospital, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Rd., Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan, China. Phn 886-2-8792-7135. Fax 886-2-8792-7136. E-mail haungben@tpts5.seed.net.tw
Received 2002-09-12 Accepted 2002-10-17
KEY WORDS tetrandrine; T-lymphocytes; autoimmune diseases; alkaloids
ABSTRACT
Autoimmune diseases characterized by activation of immune effector cells and damage of target organs are currently treated with a combination of several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that preserve different immunomodulatory mechanisms. Such a combination treatment strategy not only provides synergistic effects but also reduces side effects from individual drug. Tetrandrine (Tet), purified from a creeper Stephania tetrandra S Moore, is a bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloid and has been used to treat patients with silicosis, autoimmune disorders, and hypertension in Mainland China for decades. The accumulated studies both in vitro and in vivo reveal that Tet preserves a wide variety of immunosuppressive effects. Importantly, the Tet-mediated immunosuppressive mechanisms are evidently different from some known DMARDs. The synergistic effects have also been demonstrated between Tet and other DMARDs like FK506 and cyclosporin. These results highlight Tet a very potential candidate to be considered as one of DMARDs in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis. This review summarizes evidence-based in vivo and in vitro studies on this potential Chinese immunosuppressive herb.
INTRODUCTION
The immune system is a well-organized and well-regulated system and its dysregulation may lead to the development of autoimmune diseases. The proto-type of such a group of illnesses is rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease with progressive and massive destruction of joints accompanied with or without other organ involvement. Although many contributing factors were considered to play roles in causing rheumatoid arthritis, the etiology remains unclear. While no single agent was proven to be enough to control disease progression, current acceptable therapy for rheumatoid arthritis is aimed to attenuate disease activity with a combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporin, gold, azathioprine etc[1-3]. The purpose of a combination therapy is to obtain synergistic therapeutic effects of drugs with different immunomodulatory mechanisms and, in the meantime, to reduce side effects from each drug by decreasing their dosages.
Along the way of investigating the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, the activated immune effector cells such as T cells, B cells, monocytes/macrophages, and dendritic cells have been consistently found in the peripheral blood and the involved organs. Among these immune effector cells, T cells have been considered to be the most important because the regulation of T cell activation requires antigen specificity and a great amount of cytokines released in autoimmune responses are from T cells[4-7].
It is clear that full activation of T cells requires the integration of two signals: one is from a T cell receptor signal and the other is from a costimulatory signal[8]. Among the molecules expressing costimulatory activities on T cells, only CD28 could in combination with the activation of T cell receptor induce detectable levels of interleukin-2 and prevent anergy, a status of un-responsiveness[9,10]. The importance of CD28 costimulation in T cell activation is substantiated by the accumulated data showing that 1) blockade of CD28 costimulatory signal leads to the reduction of disease severity and proteinuria as well as the prolongation of survival in lupus-prone mice[11]; 2) blockade of CD28 costimulation results in the increased survival of the transplanted organs such as heart, kidney, bone marrow and pancreas[12-16]; 3) enhanced activation of CD28 by immobilized anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) leads to the reduction of virus load as well as the expansion of CD4+ T cells in HIV-infected patients[17]; 4) blockade of CD28 costimulation causes improvement of symptoms in psoriasis patients[18]; 5) introduction of CD28 costimulation elicits tumor rejection in animal models[19-21].
Aside from the activation of immune effector cells, the defective apoptosis (programmed cell death) mechanism also plays a crucial role in disease progression of RA and other autoimmune diseases[22-25]. Apoptosis is a natural protective mechanism for embryogenesis, for thymic organ to eliminate inappropriate T cells and for immune-privilege sites to protect from inflammatory cell invasion[26,27]. Different from the necrotic process, the apoptotic process does not induce any inflammatory response because dead cells or their degraded products are rapidly phagocytosed before any leakage of cellular contents. Since the etiology of autoimmune diseases is largely unknown, the immune reaction towards the apoptotic bodies released or apoptotic antigens expressed from dead cells has been implied as one of the mechanisms leading to autoimmune diseases[28-31]. After development of autoimmune diseases, fail to execute the appropriate apoptotic program may result in sustention of inflammatory process[32-38]. In light of the significance of apoptotic process, the apoptosis-based therapy has been suggested as one of the approaches to control the progression of autoimmune diseases[39].
Altogether, both the inappropriate activation of immune effector cells and the ineffective deletion (through apoptosis) of these cells may lead to the development and progression of autoimmune disorders (Fig 1). The therapeutic approaches for autoimmune diseases may rely on both the inhibition of cell activation and the maintenance or enhancement of the apoptotic program of immune effector cells.
Fig 1. Regulation of immune effector cells leads to autoimmune diseases. Two major pathways contribute to the development of autoimmune diseases; one is the over-expanded proliferation or activation of immune effector cells and the other is the defective execution of the apoptotic program of immune effector cells, especially those already being activated cells.
Although the significance of T cells in autoimmune pathogenesis is very clear, the T-cell directed biological therapies for RA has been unsuccessful due to both lack of efficacy and serious side effects. The use of pharmacological agents such as cyclosporin A and leflunomide that block T cell activation and proliferation give more promising therapeutic outcomes (reviewed in [40]). Han-Fang-Chi is the dried tuberous root of the creeper Stephania tetrandra S Moore. The purification of Han-Fang-Chi yields an active ingredient tetrandrine (Tet) that accounts for its major biological activities[41]. Tet has been used in China for several decades to treat patients with silicosis and rheumatic diseases that are associated with the activation and infiltration of immune effector cells at lesion sites. In a clinical study of Tet effects in silicosis patients, the administration of 200 mg or 300 mg per day with averagely total 120 gm(s) of Tet to silicosis patients results in significant improvement of pulmonary function and reduces the progression of silicosis[42]. Additionally, such a therapeutic strategy only causes limited side effects during the three-year follow-up. These side effects include abdominal distension, diarrhea, dry eye, itching, hyperpigmentation and mildly elevated liver enzymes. All these symptoms and signs resolve spontaneously after discontinuance of the medication[42]. This clinical observation highlights not only the effectiveness but also the acceptable tolerance of Tet for clinical use.
EFFECTS ON T CELLS
The early observation that Tet inhibits delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses in mice model suggests that Tet may have some direct effects on T cells[43]. Subsequently, Kondo et al[44] showed that Tet inhibited plaque-forming cell response to a T-cell-dependent antigen, sheep red blood cell, but it has no effect on such a response to a T-cell-independent antigen, lipopolysaccharide. Furthermore, the severity of arthritis is greatly reduced by late or prophylactic administration of Tet in an adjuvant-induced chronic arthritis model of rats[45].
Based upon these observations, a series of studies examining directly the effects
of Tet on T cells were performed. In purified human peripheral blood T cells,
Tet inhibits the CD28-costimulated T cell proliferation and cytokine production.
Both T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cytokines are susceptible to Tet suppression[46].
However, Tet may or may not directly down-regulate CD28 signaling pathway because
T cell receptor-mediated signaling events can also be inhibited by Tet. The
investigation of Tet-regulated T cell receptor down-stream signaling pathways
clearly shows that Tet specifically inhibits protein kinase C-dependent but
not calcium-dependent signaling events[47]. In addition, these observations
suggest that the immunosuppressive effects of Tet may not relate to its calcium-channel
blocking properties[47]. Since there are more than 11 protein kinase
C isoenzymes identified so far[48], whether Tet targets one or several
protein kinase C isoenzyme-mediated signaling pathways is currently not known.
Because the activation of protein kinase C isoenzymes can readily be detected
in many signaling pathways in a variety of immune and non-immune effector cells,
these results also partly explain the broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory properties
of Tet[48,49]. Molecular dissec
tion of Tet-targeting signaling molecules showed that Tet effectively inhibited
CD28-costimulated NF-
B activities
and had ignored effects on AP-1 activities (unpublished observations). These
observations conclude that Tet could down-regulate the activation of T cell
receptor through at least blocking protein kinase C and NF-
B
signaling pathways (Fig 2).
Fig 2. Tetrandrine targets protein kinase C-NF-
B
signaling pathway. The T cell receptor signal is conducted via the CD3 complex
that contains several subunits. This signal then causes both increase of intracellular
calcium and activation of protein kinase C isoenzymes. The increase of intracellular
calcium leads to the activation of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)
and the activation of protein kinase C results in the stimulation of NF-
B
transcription factors. CD28 costimulation has unique effects, distinct from
those through T cell receptor, on the activation of NF-
B.
Tet is supposed to inhibit the T cell receptor-mediated protein kinase C-NF-
B
signaling pathway. Whether Tet has direct effect on CD28-mediated NF-
B
activation is currently unclear. In contrast, cyclosporin is a suppressor of
calcium-dependent NFAT activation.
Both in vivo and in vitro studies also suggest that the T cell receptor signaling pathway targeted by Tet is different from that targeted by cyclosporin that inhibits Ca2+-dependent calcineurin activity[46,50]. Importantly, the combination of both Tet and cyclosporin provides a synergism at much lower therapeutic concentrations of each drug[47]. Indeed, in diabetes animal models, Lieberman et al[51] also showed that Tet in combination with FK506, an immunosuppressive agent functionally similar to but more potent than cyclosporin, synergistically prevent the development of diabetes.
EFFECTS ON OTHER IMMUNE EFFECTOR CELLS
The immunosuppressive effects of Tet could also be demonstrated in other immune
effector cells, including macrophages, monocytes, B cells, neutrophils, and
mast cells. At therapeutic concentrations, Tet inhibits the production of tumor
necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) from
monocytes stimulated with killed Staphylococcus aureus[52].
Both fangchinoline and isotetrandrine, two Tet analogues, also inhibit interleukin-1
(IL-1) and TNF-
production from
Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear
cells[53]. Such an effect is mediated at least through transcriptional
regulation of mRNA expression of these cytokine genes. Further expansion of
these observations demonstrates that Tet inhibits not only IL-1 and TNF-
but also other cytokines like IL-6 and IL-8 production from activated monocytes
as well as inhibits the antibody production from activated B cells[54].
Moreover, Tet significantly blocks the extent of inflammation of uveitis induced
by endotoxin and IL-1
administration
in rats[55]. Therefore, aside from the inhibition of cytokine production,
Tet also suppresses cytokine-mediated tissue damage, a suggestion that Tet may
directly block cytokine-mediated signaling pathways. The results of these studies
may somehow be explained in part by an early observation showing that Tet significantly
inhibits the production of nitric oxide, a critical mediator of inflammation,
in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages[56]. In cultured human
umbilical vein endothelial cells, Tet dose-dependently inhibits the secretion
of a chemotactic factor and then blocks the migration of monocytes[57].
In addition, Tet also suppresses the IL-1
and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced tube formation of rat vascular
endothelial cells, an important step in angiogenesis[58]. The inhibitory
potency is measured to be about 100-fold stronger than hydrocortisone[58].
With regard to innate immune responses, Tet has been shown to down-regulate tumor promoter and phorbol myristate acetate-induced adherence of neutrophils[59]. The phagocytic effects of neutrophils are also greatly inhibited by Tet[54]. In an animal model of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury, Tet effectively suppresses the up-regulation of Mac-1 on neutrophils and therefore blocks their migration and reduces the injury-induced myocardial infarct size and ventricular tachyarrhythmia[60].
INDUCTION OF PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH (APOPTOSIS)
Since the apoptotic process is defective in autoimmune diseases[33-35], any drug that could potentially induce the apoptosis of activated immune effector cells may have its additional advantage to control the inappropriate expansion of immune responses. Several Western anti-rheumatic drugs such as corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hydroxychloroquine, and a Chinese anti-rheumatic drug, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook f, have been shown to preserve the capacity of inducing cellular apoptosis[61-64]. Reasonably, the apoptotic effects of Tet may also play a role in the control of autoimmune disorders.
Tet at 0.1 µmol/L to 100 µmol/L concentration-dependently reduces the viability of mouse peritoneal macrophages, guinea-pig alveolar macrophages and mouse macrophage-like J774 cells[65]. In the example of other permanent cell lines, U937 and HL-60, Tet also dose-dependently inhibits cellular proliferation and induces cellular apoptosis[66,67]. In contrast to the cellular apoptosis induced by glucocorticoids in CEM-C7 cells, the induction of apoptosis by Tet is much more rapid (40 h compared to 4 h, respectively)[68]. In addition, the Tet-induced cellular apoptosis appears not to require de novo protein synthesis[68]. A finding suggests that glucocorticoid-induced and Tet-induced cellular apoptosis may be mediated through different mechanisms. Aside from the results shown in immortal cell lines and murine cells, Tet could also induce the apoptotic program in human peripheral blood lymphocytes[67].
Consistent with the results in other immune effector cells, Tet effectively causes apoptosis of human peripheral blood T cells[47,69]. Importantly, compared to resting T cells, Tet preserves much stronger killing capacity towards activated T cells[69]. When drug-induced apoptosis was readily compared, the results suggest that the Tet-induced T cell apoptotic mechanism is different from the one induced by hydroxychloroquine, a commonly used Western antirheumatic drug[69]. While Tet-induced T cell apoptotic DNA damage requires caspase-3 activity, hydroxychloroquine-induced T cell apoptotic DNA damage is mediated through a caspase-3- and caspase-8-independent but Z-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp.fluomethyl ketone-sensitive signaling pathway[69]. The differential usages of caspase-mediated apoptotic mechanisms by Tet and hydroxychloroquine may also provide a possible synergism of prescribing both drugs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
ANTI-OXIDATIVE EFFECTS
One of the important effects of Tet that may explain many of its biological activities is the anti-oxidative property. In measuring both hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase and erythrocytes auto-oxidation systems, Tet effectively scavenges the generated superoxide anions at concentrations from 7.5 to 15 µmol/L[70]. Other evidence also shows that Tet inhibits freshly fractured quartz-induced lipid peroxidation[71]. In evaluation of active oxygen production from neutrophils, the results indicate that the generation of superoxide and luminol-dependent chemiluminescence induced by opsonized zymosan, arachidonic acid, formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, or by phorbol myristate acetate decreases significantly when Tet or its analogues are added into the reaction[72]. In addition, Tet inhibits hexose-monophosphate shunt activity and hydrogen peroxide production in neutrophils[73]. The anti-oxidative reaction rate constant of Tet with *OH is determined to be 1.4× 1010 mol-1×s-1 , a value that is comparable with other antioxidants such as ascorbate, glutathione, and cysteine[74]. When human mononuclear cells were examined, Tet greatly inhibits irradiation-induced superoxide production from these cells[75]. In animal models, via inhibiting Ca2+ influx and reactive oxygen species formation, Tet suppresses neutrophil adhesion to fibrinogen[76]. Part of the effects is mediated through G protein modulation that prevents Mac-1 up-regulation in neutrophil activation[77].
STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION
A great potential for Tet being one of the DMARDs is the advantage that there are several structurally similar Tet analogues. Importantly, the subtle structural difference among Tet analogues appears to have great impact on their differential immunosuppressive activities. Based upon their structural similarity and the difference in biological activity, structural modification of this group of drugs can lead to the discovery or development of more potent yet less toxic immunosuppressive drugs.
Tet and berbamine are two purified plant alkaloid analogues. Differ by only
one substitution in the side chain of one of the benzene rings, these two drugs
pre
serve quite different immunosuppressive activities. For example, Tet but not
berbamine inhibits the chronic inflammation of adjuvant-induced arthritis in
rats[45]. The incidence of relapsing experimental allergic encephalitis
(EAE) is reduced by 41 % and 65 % for Tet and berbamine treatment, respectively[78].
Tet is shown to preserve 6-18 times more potent than berbamine in suppressing
the production of IL-1 and TNF-
from the stimulated monocytes and macrophages as well as the production of TNF-
by activated lymphocytes[79]. Investigation of the direct cytokine
effects in rat subcutaneous air pouch model of inflammation reveals that both
compounds are equipotent in suppressing leukocyte infiltration into air pouches
induced by IL-1 and TNF[80]. Nevertheless, Tet is more potent than
berbamine as a suppressant of platelet activating factor-induced mononuclear
cell infiltration and is less effective than berbamine in carageenen-induced
polymorphonuclear cell infiltration[80]. While Tet has stronger suppressive
effects on adherence and locomotion of neutrophils, berbamine preserves greater
capacity for inhibition of natural killer cell cytotoxicity[81].
Along the arachidonic acid metabolizing pathway, Tet but not berbamine potently
inhibits the lipooxygenase-dependent leukotriene production from activated human
monocytes and neutrophils. However, both compounds were equally potent in suppressing
cyclooxygenase-dependent prostaglandin generation[82]. In the context
of T cell response, both Tet and berbamine are equipotent in suppressing the
induction and expression phases of DTH responses to sheep red blood cell antigens
in mice[83]. When human peripheral blood T cells were examined, the
results also indicate that both Tet and berbamine equipotently block CD28-costimulated
T cell activities, including cytokine production, cell surface activation marker
expression as well as cell proliferation[46]. This study also identifies
dauricine as the most potent one among Tet analogues that inhibit CD28-costimulated
T cell activities[46]. Surprisingly, the accumulated evidence also
suggests that Tet but not berbamine preserves strong anti-oxidative activity[72,
81]. The results in a series of these studies are summarized in Tab 1.
Tab 1. Comparison of the biological activities bewteen tetrandrine and berbamine.
CONCLUSION
Tet preserves very extensive immunosuppressive effects through inhibiting the
activation of various immune effector cells and inducing the apoptosis of these
cells. The molecular target of Tet is currently unknown, but likely to be involved
in T cell receptor - protein kinase C-NF-
B
signaling pathway in the example of T cells. Although only minor structural
difference is present among Tet and its analogues, great biological differences
exist among these analogues. These observations also give us important insights
into structure-activity relationships of Tet and its analogues and the opportunity
to design novel analogues that are potentially more potent and less toxic than
currently available drugs for the treatment of autoimmune disorders.
Aside from its calcium-channel blocking effects, there are at least two major fields about Tet that are not covered in this review. One is its anti-cancer effect like the increase of chemotherapeutic agent drug sensitivity in multi-drug resistance cells and the other is its anti-silicosis effect like the inhibition of pulmonary macrophage and pulmonary fibroblast activation. In this context, the clinical application of this drug may not be limited to the currently known knowledge on this drug.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the help from Dr HO Ling-Jun and for her significant contributions to the series of our publications.
REFERENCES